ABSTRACT
There are known racial disparities in the organ transplant allocation system in the United States. While recent research has focused on designing scores and matching algorithms for organ allocation, prior work has yet to study how transplant center physician decisions on offer acceptance—the final step in the allocation process—contribute to the observed disparities. In this paper, we use data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to examine the role of candidate race in the acceptance of heart, liver, and lung transplant offers. We find that Black race was associated with significantly lower odds of offer acceptance for livers and lungs. Further, existing allocation scores such as MELD and LAS did not account for clinical factors that made Black patients harder to match. Our analysis also revealed that donor candidate race-match was associated with significantly higher odds of offer acceptance for hearts, livers, and lungs. Finally, we found that rejecting an offer was associated with lower survival times for all three organs. Our findings demonstrate the additional barriers that Black patients face in accessing organ transplants and the consequences of these barriers on patient survival. Overall, our work highlights the limitations of technical solutions to socio-technical problems; new allocation scores and other algorithmic updates will not improve equity if they do not explicitly account for gaps in the ensuing human decisions.
Co-authors: Hammaad Adam, Rene S. Bermea, Ming Ying Yang, Leo Anthony Celi